![]() |
Against Monopolydefending the right to innovategene patents |
Monopoly corrupts. Absolute monopoly corrupts absolutely. |
||
|
Copyright Notice: We don't think much of copyright, so you can do what you want with the content on this blog. Of course we are hungry for publicity, so we would be pleased if you avoided plagiarism and gave us credit for what we have written. We encourage you not to impose copyright restrictions on your "derivative" works, but we won't try to stop you. For the legally or statist minded, you can consider yourself subject to a Creative Commons Attribution License. |
|
More evidence about the beneficial effect of patents[Posted at 02/04/2012 10:28 AM by David K. Levine on gene patents Gene patents upheld on appeal Andrew Pollack reports that "Myriad Genetics retained its monopoly on a lucrative genetic test for breast cancer risk when a federal appeals court recently upheld the company's patents on two human genes and the validity of gene patents in general." It seems to me that this is so wrong as to defy any rational explanation link here.
Remembering that the constitutional basis for patents is that they encourage innovation, the patent is here granted on the wrong thing. A gene is not invented or developed. It is not a creation of human ingenuity. The patent should not be on the gene but on the process or procedure to identify it. The Appeals Court ruling pretty clearly identifies the gene as patentable, apparently because the procedure has transformed it. The finding is buried in 105 pages of opinion link here . Worst result: Gene patents have in general been upheld. Let's hope the Supremes to overturn it. [Posted at 08/26/2011 12:57 PM by John Bennett on gene patents Fund raising for feature documentary - Who Owns You? As I noted previously, I was interviewed recently for a promising new documentary by lawyer-philosopher David Koepsell and filmmaker Taylor Roesch, "Who Owns You?" (Here's the first trailer, on Vimeo.) Here's an email I just received from Taylor:
Hello Family and Friends, [Posted at 05/24/2010 11:58 AM by Stephan Kinsella on gene patents Who Owns You? - A Documentary - Trailer Here's the first trailer for a promising new documentary by lawyer-philosopher David Koepsell and filmmaker Taylor Roesch (I was interviewed for it as mentioned here). Vimeo;
Who Owns You? - A Documentary - Trailer from Taylor Roesch on Vimeo. Over the last 20 years, the United States Patent and Trademark Office has been issuing patents to universities and private companies on raw human genes. One company or university is given a legal monopoly over a molecule that is inside every human being and many other animals. This documentary explores the legal, ethical, and clinical ramifications of human gene patenting. [Posted at 05/18/2010 09:35 PM by Stephan Kinsella on gene patents |
|
Most Recent Comments IIPA thinks open source equals piracy Its not the case that reader must be completely agreed with author's views about article. So this at 04/30/2013 02:15 AM by Powercom ARS
IIPA thinks open source equals piracy My brother and I genuinely enjoyed reading on this site, I was just interested to know if you trade at 04/28/2013 07:43 AM by The Body Project
Catching Up The Ruth Lewis post is interesting, but incomplete. The very economies that are supposedly at 01/31/2013 07:21 AM by Anonymous
Canada - A Copyright Year in Review Hello. I don't like copyright law but I don't think it will go away in my life. I started a at 01/02/2013 04:58 AM by Sabrina
Canada - A Copyright Year in Review Regarding the Copyright Act revision, let it be known that there was substantial opposition to the at 12/28/2012 06:57 AM by Byte
From the Trenches Innovative remarks indeed. Cecil Quillen suggests the system needs to be modified, which I think at 12/21/2012 06:18 PM by Anonymous
The golden age of beer innovation ""Perhaps the first reason [for the rate of patenting] is that during this period the rate of at 12/20/2012 05:46 PM by Anonymous
Obama Transition Team Member on Holy cow. None of Your Beeswax is a Canadian (Laurier Optical is Canadian only). You don't even at 12/19/2012 06:08 PM by Anonymous
The golden age of beer innovation Adam_Smith:
Until the latter half of the 19th century, corporations routinely filed for patents, at 12/19/2012 04:54 PM by Brewing Is Fun
The golden age of beer innovation It would seem from the account given in the previous comment that it was innovation that stimulated at 12/19/2012 04:04 AM by Adam_Smith
Would books be published without copyright? taxpayer:
"The Wealth of Nations" went through five editions in the first 13 years of publication, at 12/05/2012 08:31 AM by Anonymous
Would books be published without copyright? I was wondering whether free-market advocate Adam Smith made much money from his books.
On-line at 12/04/2012 09:59 AM by taxpayer
Open Book Publisher Great work! Here's my quick review of the book:
It seems to me that behavioral economists at 11/27/2012 08:38 PM by Aaron Wolf
250000 Patents for Smartphone Technology Hi. Sorry for posting here as I cannot see a contact us section.
How can I contact you?
I have at 11/27/2012 10:17 AM by Thomas Stringer
The golden age of beer innovation With respect to the beer innovation paper, I have to wonder whether the authors were overly focused at 11/23/2012 08:31 AM by Brewing Is Fun
The golden age of beer innovation With respect to Christian's comment that "there was rapid innovation without recourse to patents," at 11/21/2012 03:16 PM by Beer Innovation
250000 Patents for Smartphone Technology I have seen several analysts who believe that the number of patents in this area indicate that our at 10/24/2012 08:40 AM by Anonymous
Would books be published without copyright? Gael:
I would be curious as to how much copyright litigation is costing. I have never seen any at 10/19/2012 01:12 PM by Anonymous
Would books be published without copyright? I think it's going to evolve towards a better system with or without copyright. Right now copyright at 10/19/2012 11:46 AM by Gael N.
Patents and Secrecy Of course patents are not the "only" answer. That is just plain dumb. There are multiple business at 10/13/2012 08:47 AM by Anonymous
|