logo

Against Monopoly

defending the right to innovate

Patents

Monopoly corrupts. Absolute monopoly corrupts absolutely.





Copyright Notice: We don't think much of copyright, so you can do what you want with the content on this blog. Of course we are hungry for publicity, so we would be pleased if you avoided plagiarism and gave us credit for what we have written. We encourage you not to impose copyright restrictions on your "derivative" works, but we won't try to stop you. For the legally or statist minded, you can consider yourself subject to a Creative Commons Attribution License.


back

Abundance of ridiculous patents is no joke

These were collected in the course of other research by Azeen Ghorayshi and put online as a slide show by Mother Jones magazine link here.

My favorite is #6 in the slides called "method of concealing partial baldness" patented on May 10, 1977. Here is the illustration for the patent which should have been denied on the grounds that it was already in wide use among the balding. .

Really makes me feel confident of the wisdom and judgment of the patent office and it has been that way for years and years. What happened to good sense.


Comments

I have met hundreds, if not thousands, of bald people in my life. I have seen comb-overs, but I have never met one that used a technique similar to the that claimed in the patent, 4,022,227. How many have you met, John Bennett?

While the technique is interesting and one I have never seen before, there are several problems with the technique. First, the way the claims are written the hair would not stay in place. So the patent is hardly practical. Second, it would like even worse than a comb-over. Third, it has no business value because you would never find the people doing this since this technique is something individuals would practice. On the other hand, people invest in stupid stuff all the time and spend far more money doing than a few hundred dollars on a patent, so I guess if their goal is to get a useless patent, then they succeeded.

actually this is probably the best patent ever! It will prevent anyone from using it!!! guys really need to be stopped from using a comb over!
AdmFubar:

I think you are correct. Seriously, simple comb-overs are bad enough. A three direction comb-over not only sounds impractical, it sounds ridiculous.


Submit Comment

Blog Post

Name:

Email (optional):

Your Humanity:

Prove you are human by retyping the anti-spam code.
For example if the code is unodosthreefour,
type 1234 in the textbox below.

Anti-spam Code
UnoThreeSixTwo:


Post



   
Find online and local Economics Lessons
Economics Lessons | Add your site

Most Recent Comments

IIPA thinks open source equals piracy Its not the case that reader must be completely agreed with author's views about article. So this

IIPA thinks open source equals piracy My brother and I genuinely enjoyed reading on this site, I was just interested to know if you trade

Catching Up The Ruth Lewis post is interesting, but incomplete. The very economies that are supposedly

Canada - A Copyright Year in Review Hello. I don't like copyright law but I don't think it will go away in my life. I started a

Canada - A Copyright Year in Review Regarding the Copyright Act revision, let it be known that there was substantial opposition to the

From the Trenches Innovative remarks indeed. Cecil Quillen suggests the system needs to be modified, which I think

The golden age of beer innovation ""Perhaps the first reason [for the rate of patenting] is that during this period the rate of

Obama Transition Team Member on Holy cow. None of Your Beeswax is a Canadian (Laurier Optical is Canadian only). You don't even

The golden age of beer innovation Adam_Smith: Until the latter half of the 19th century, corporations routinely filed for patents,

The golden age of beer innovation It would seem from the account given in the previous comment that it was innovation that stimulated

Would books be published without copyright? taxpayer: "The Wealth of Nations" went through five editions in the first 13 years of publication,

Would books be published without copyright? I was wondering whether free-market advocate Adam Smith made much money from his books. On-line

Open Book Publisher Great work! Here's my quick review of the book: It seems to me that behavioral economists

250000 Patents for Smartphone Technology Hi. Sorry for posting here as I cannot see a contact us section. How can I contact you? I have

The golden age of beer innovation With respect to the beer innovation paper, I have to wonder whether the authors were overly focused

The golden age of beer innovation With respect to Christian's comment that "there was rapid innovation without recourse to patents,"

250000 Patents for Smartphone Technology I have seen several analysts who believe that the number of patents in this area indicate that our

Would books be published without copyright? Gael: I would be curious as to how much copyright litigation is costing. I have never seen any

Would books be published without copyright? I think it's going to evolve towards a better system with or without copyright. Right now copyright

Patents and Secrecy Of course patents are not the "only" answer. That is just plain dumb. There are multiple business