![]() |
Against Monopolydefending the right to innovateIntellectual Monopoly |
Monopoly corrupts. Absolute monopoly corrupts absolutely. |
||
Copyright Notice: We don't think much of copyright, so you can do what you want with the content on this blog. Of course we are hungry for publicity, so we would be pleased if you avoided plagiarism and gave us credit for what we have written. We encourage you not to impose copyright restrictions on your "derivative" works, but we won't try to stop you. For the legally or statist minded, you can consider yourself subject to a Creative Commons Attribution License. |
|
backCorruption One of the big problems with monopoly is the corruption involved. John's post about campaign contributions by corporations - I'm not sure that banning them is really effective though - reminds us that one of the problems is that the monopolization of government power through bribery helps sustains those monopolies. It's also true that monopolies have strong economic incentive for "marketing" including bribing those who are responsible for the welfare of others. Case in point - the pharmaceutical companies bribery of doctors to get them to prescribe their patented products. Why don't book publishers bribe professors to assign their books to their students? It seems they do. [Posted at 10/07/2009 05:38 AM by David K. Levine on Intellectual Monopoly Comments You have raised the issue of "corruption". The current state of "corruption" in our social fabric does not really seem, to me, to be a case of monopoly power. It is a case of capitalism morphing into a nameless economic system (Corporatism?) were the producers feel entitled to do whatever they want to make $$$. The fact that it damages others, or even ruins our entire financial system is irrelevant. Ayn Rand's objectivism run amok.
I have more on this here: Legalizing Theft - The New Capitalism III Steve Forbes has a good editorial: Capitalism: A True Love Story. While I don't agree with him in many cases, he makes the central points that Capitalism is based, in part, on trust and an exchange of goods/services for mutual benefit. Both trust and the an exchange of goods/services for mutual benefit seem to be so passe now. Gordon Gekko would be so proud.
[Comment at 10/07/2009 10:40 AM by Steve R.] What's in a name? Market power or pricing power is what monopoly offers. It comes from a government grant or a private seizure. The question is, what do we do about it? The US has been through similar experiences before when business got dominant political power.
The first thing is make people aware when it is happening. Television news is one example. Aside from Public Broadcasting, by my lights, it isn't news; it is entertainment. That is a consequence of the ratings game and big business ownership of the air waves, and more importantly, now, of cable distribution. I will post another example, later today: the imposition of "facilities fees" on top of medical charges, once again raising the cost of health care. [Comment at 10/07/2009 12:48 PM by John Bennett] Submit Comment |
|
![]() ![]() ![]() Most Recent Comments A Texas Tale of Intellectual Property Litigation (A Watering Hole Patent Trolls) Aunque suena insignificante, los números son alarmantes y nos demuestran que no es tan mínimo como at 06/29/2022 08:48 AM by Abogado de Accidente de Carro en Huntington Park
at 11/27/2021 05:53 PM by Nobody
at 01/06/2021 06:57 PM by Anonymous
at 01/06/2021 06:57 PM by Anonymous
at 01/06/2021 06:57 PM by Anonymous
at 01/06/2021 06:57 PM by Anonymous
at 01/06/2021 06:57 PM by Anonymous
at 01/06/2021 06:57 PM by Anonymous
at 01/06/2021 06:57 PM by Anonymous
at 01/06/2021 06:57 PM by Anonymous
at 01/06/2021 06:57 PM by Anonymous
at 01/06/2021 06:57 PM by Anonymous
at 01/06/2021 06:57 PM by Anonymous
at 01/06/2021 06:57 PM by Anonymous
at 01/06/2021 06:57 PM by Anonymous
at 01/06/2021 06:57 PM by Anonymous
at 01/06/2021 06:47 PM by Anonymous
at 01/06/2021 06:47 PM by Anonymous
at 01/06/2021 06:42 PM by Anonymous
at 01/06/2021 06:42 PM by Anonymous
|