Against Monopoly

defending the right to innovate

Monopoly corrupts. Absolute monopoly corrupts absolutely.

Copyright Notice: We don't think much of copyright, so you can do what you want with the content on this blog. Of course we are hungry for publicity, so we would be pleased if you avoided plagiarism and gave us credit for what we have written. We encourage you not to impose copyright restrictions on your "derivative" works, but we won't try to stop you. For the legally or statist minded, you can consider yourself subject to a Creative Commons Attribution License.

current posts | more recent posts



Here's an interesting post, which is linked to at the www.divisionoflabour.com blog.

link here


I hope you are wrong.


I like the stallion analogy, because it is appropriate. However, as ranchers and cowboys know, you work with the horse and eventually develop a trust and rapport with the horse. Controlling the stallion without the trust and rapport never works. Further, sometimes the stallion will go off in unexpected directions. The appropriate response is to gently reassert your leadership, not beat the horse or put it into a smaller corral.

Unfortunately, it is our government that refuses to learn the new tricks, not the stallion. Regulation can be good and useful, particularly when there are a pattern of abuses, but over-regulation merely makes things more unpredictable and in the current case delays market response to actual economic conditions.

The moral of the story: The current market correction is necessary and healthy, and the government should avoid stepping in unless there is an actual crisis instead of a made-up one.

The link provided by Bill to "Scapegoating Markets" is a good article. What troubles me is that if we want a free market to work effectively we need to have responsible self-control.

The article correctly notes that greed has existed forever and analogized it to gravity. The obvious implication, greed is a perpetual force that we have to live with. But there is a difference, an improperly designed airplane will not fly. Greed on the other hand can be designed to be hidden. So our financial system was able to fly (using innovative accounting) for a while, before the house-of-cards was exposed and collapsed.

I doubt any of us want a socialist economy, however it continually astonishes me that most free market advocates (despite the mantra of responsibility) never actually call for self responsibility. The unintended consequence of not acting responsibly when those actions hurt citizens is the imposition of State control on your actions. Much like a parent taking away the keys to the car when a teenager gets too many tickets.

One could also say that the financial institutions, in their unfettered greed, killed the goose laying the golden eggs.

current posts | more recent posts

Submit Comment

Blog Post


Email (optional):

Your Humanity:

Prove you are human by retyping the anti-spam code.
For example if the code is unodosthreefour,
type 1234 in the textbox below.

Anti-spam Code



Most Recent Comments

Questions and Challenges For Defenders of the Current Copyright Regime It is one of the finest websites I have stumbled upon. It is not only well developed, but has good

Killing people with patents I'm not really commenting the post, but rather asking if this blog is going to make a comeback

The right to rub smooth using a hardened steel tool with ridges Finally got around to looking at the comments, sorry for delay... Replying to Stephan: I'm sorry

Let's See: Pallas, Pan, Patents, Persephone, Perses, Poseidon, Prometheus... Seems like a kinda bizarre proposal to me. We just need to abolish the patent system, not replace

The right to rub smooth using a hardened steel tool with ridges I'm a bit confused by this--even if "hired to invent" went away, that would just change the default

Do we need a law? @ Alexander Baker: So basically, if I copy parts of 'Titus Andronicus' to a webpage without

Do we need a law? The issue is whether the crime is punished not who punishes it. If somebody robs our house we do

Do we need a law? 1. Plagiarism most certainly is illegal, it is called "copyright infringement". One very famous

Yet another proof of the inutility of copyright. The 9/11 Commission report cost $15,000,000 to produce, not counting the salaries of the authors.

WKRP In Cincinnati - Requiem For A Masterpiece P.S. The link to Amazon's WKRP product page:

WKRP In Cincinnati - Requiem For A Masterpiece Hopefully some very good news. Shout! Factory is releasing the entire series of WKRP in Cincinnati,

What's copywritable? Go fish in court. @ Anonymous: You misunderstood my intent. I was actually trying to point out a huge but basic

Rights Violations Aren't the Only Bads I hear that nonsense from pro-IP people all the

Intellectual Property Fosters Corporate Concentration Yeah, I see the discouragement of working on a patented device all the time. Great examples

Music without copyright Hundreds of businessmen are looking for premium quality article distribution services that can be

Les patent trolls ne sont pas toujours des officines

Les patent trolls ne sont pas toujours des officines

Patent Lawyers Who Don't Toe the Line Should Be Punished! Moreover "the single most destructive force to innovation is patents". We'd like to unite with you

Bonfire of the Missalettes!

Does the decline in total factor productivity explain the drop in innovation? So, if our patent system was "broken," TFP of durable goods should have dropped. Conversely, since