logo

Against Monopoly

defending the right to innovate

Against Monopoly

Monopoly corrupts. Absolute monopoly corrupts absolutely.





Copyright Notice: We don't think much of copyright, so you can do what you want with the content on this blog. Of course we are hungry for publicity, so we would be pleased if you avoided plagiarism and gave us credit for what we have written. We encourage you not to impose copyright restrictions on your "derivative" works, but we won't try to stop you. For the legally or statist minded, you can consider yourself subject to a Creative Commons Attribution License.


back

Continuing Madness

The current proposal to rescue Wall Street from its follies, all 102 pages of it. Chances are in a document of that length that will be approved in about 12 hours there are some easter eggs. If you have the time to look and spot any, post a comment.

I've now read it in a manner of speaking. It does not seem that different than the original bill. He gets $350 billion with no questions asked which he can do pretty much as he pleases with, with another $350 if he asks and Congress does not veto it within 10 days or 15 days, depending on which part of page 51 you believe. The oversight provisions appear weak with actual oversight being done entirely by the executive branch plus the chairman of the Fed. The congressionally appointed "oversight" committee seems to be limited to writing a report about regulatory reform. The Treasury which has been backstopping money market funds - not a bad idea under the current circumstances - now seems to be prohibited from doing so. There are some modest provisions about CEO compensation, workouts for homeowners, and authorization to operate a security insurance program.

The basic objection to the bill is it is likely to cost a lot of money without accomplishing a great deal. That isn't solved in the details. Beyond that, the bill is surprisingly weak in the details. My interpretation is that this is that Treasury got what they wanted, with a bunch of rhetoric and cosmetic stuff put in so that Congress can say they got the taxpayer a better deal.


Comments


Submit Comment

Blog Post

Name:

Email (optional):

Your Humanity:

Prove you are human by retyping the anti-spam code.
For example if the code is unodosthreefour,
type 1234 in the textbox below.

Anti-spam Code
UnoQuatroSixSix:


Post



   

Most Recent Comments

A Texas Tale of Intellectual Property Litigation (A Watering Hole Patent Trolls) Aunque suena insignificante, los números son alarmantes y nos demuestran que no es tan mínimo como

James Boyle's new book with his congenial IP views free to download

French firm has patents on using computers to choose medical treatment 1

French firm has patents on using computers to choose medical treatment 1

French firm has patents on using computers to choose medical treatment 1

French firm has patents on using computers to choose medical treatment 1

French firm has patents on using computers to choose medical treatment 1

French firm has patents on using computers to choose medical treatment 1

French firm has patents on using computers to choose medical treatment 1

French firm has patents on using computers to choose medical treatment 1

French firm has patents on using computers to choose medical treatment 1

French firm has patents on using computers to choose medical treatment 1

French firm has patents on using computers to choose medical treatment 1

French firm has patents on using computers to choose medical treatment 1

French firm has patents on using computers to choose medical treatment 1

French firm has patents on using computers to choose medical treatment 1

French firm has patents on using computers to choose medical treatment 1

French firm has patents on using computers to choose medical treatment 1

French firm has patents on using computers to choose medical treatment 1

French firm has patents on using computers to choose medical treatment 1