Charles Darwin's A Naturalist's Voyage Round the World may be purchased in mobipocket format on the mobipocket website for $47.99
Or you may "purchase" it in the same format from Gutenberg for $0.00
By the way: the work is not under copyright.
![]() |
Against Monopolydefending the right to innovate |
Monopoly corrupts. Absolute monopoly corrupts absolutely. |
||
Copyright Notice: We don't think much of copyright, so you can do what you want with the content on this blog. Of course we are hungry for publicity, so we would be pleased if you avoided plagiarism and gave us credit for what we have written. We encourage you not to impose copyright restrictions on your "derivative" works, but we won't try to stop you. For the legally or statist minded, you can consider yourself subject to a Creative Commons Attribution License. |
|
backOr more precisely: does Napster matter? Here is some pricing information for an ebook that may be of interest
Charles Darwin's A Naturalist's Voyage Round the World may be purchased in mobipocket format on the mobipocket website for $47.99 Or you may "purchase" it in the same format from Gutenberg for $0.00 By the way: the work is not under copyright. [Posted at 12/04/2009 03:43 PM by David K. Levine on Was Napster Right? Comments "By the way: the work is not under copyright." Are you sure? (sarcasm)
Well I did some nosing around at Amazon.com and guess what I found! When you look inside the book with Amazon's "click to look inside" feature, you will see that it is "copyrighted". Oh my gosh! Too bad, I was not able to copy the copyright notice to here. Technically, it would appear that only the introduction would be subject to copyright. Of course I would dispute that any copyright actually exists to the rest of the book, but the copyright maximalists seem to make this claim very liberally and the publishers seem to conveniently leave the copyright notice on the book. By chance, were you able to look inside the mobipocket version so see if any copyright notice appeared there?
[Comment at 12/04/2009 07:55 PM by Steve R.] David: so I guess we finally know the price of ignorance! $47.99!
Steve: the presence of a copyright notice does not prove there is copyright; its absence does not prove there is not one. [Comment at 12/06/2009 11:31 PM by Stephan Kinsella] Stephen: Correct, but the placement of the copyright notice can be considered a form of disinformation. For people who are unfamiliar with copyright, they will assume that it is subject to copyright. My intent with posting was to point our how copyright is being abused by the content industry to claim rights that they do NOT possess. [Comment at 12/07/2009 05:02 AM by Steve R.] Submit Comment |
|
![]() ![]() ![]() Most Recent Comments A Texas Tale of Intellectual Property Litigation (A Watering Hole Patent Trolls) Aunque suena insignificante, los números son alarmantes y nos demuestran que no es tan mínimo como at 06/29/2022 08:48 AM by Abogado de Accidente de Carro en Huntington Park
at 11/27/2021 05:53 PM by Nobody
at 01/06/2021 06:57 PM by Anonymous
at 01/06/2021 06:57 PM by Anonymous
at 01/06/2021 06:57 PM by Anonymous
at 01/06/2021 06:57 PM by Anonymous
at 01/06/2021 06:57 PM by Anonymous
at 01/06/2021 06:57 PM by Anonymous
at 01/06/2021 06:57 PM by Anonymous
at 01/06/2021 06:57 PM by Anonymous
at 01/06/2021 06:57 PM by Anonymous
at 01/06/2021 06:57 PM by Anonymous
at 01/06/2021 06:57 PM by Anonymous
at 01/06/2021 06:57 PM by Anonymous
at 01/06/2021 06:57 PM by Anonymous
at 01/06/2021 06:57 PM by Anonymous
at 01/06/2021 06:47 PM by Anonymous
at 01/06/2021 06:47 PM by Anonymous
at 01/06/2021 06:42 PM by Anonymous
at 01/06/2021 06:42 PM by Anonymous
|